lazpel
Sehr aktives Mitglied
- Registriert
- 7. Juni 2004
- Beiträge
- 4.906
Hallo,
Punkt 3 trifft nicht zu. Ich attackere Position Y nicht. Ich untermauere sie.
Somit gilt für Namo in diesem Fall:
Fallacy: Red herring
This fallacy is committed when someone introduces irrelevant material to the issue being discussed, so that everyone's attention is diverted away from the points made, towards a different conclusion.
und
Fallacy: Ignoratio elenchi / Irrelevant conclusion
The fallacy of Irrelevant Conclusion consists of claiming that an argument supports a particular conclusion when it is actually logically nothing to do with that conclusion.
Gruß,
lazpel
Namo schrieb:Fallacy: Straw Man "
Punkt 3 trifft nicht zu. Ich attackere Position Y nicht. Ich untermauere sie.
Somit gilt für Namo in diesem Fall:
Fallacy: Red herring
This fallacy is committed when someone introduces irrelevant material to the issue being discussed, so that everyone's attention is diverted away from the points made, towards a different conclusion.
und
Fallacy: Ignoratio elenchi / Irrelevant conclusion
The fallacy of Irrelevant Conclusion consists of claiming that an argument supports a particular conclusion when it is actually logically nothing to do with that conclusion.
Gruß,
lazpel