Genau den mein ich!!
Danke, das es hier Menschen gibt die nicht so ignorant dem Impfschadensthema gegenüberstehen.
Bei den aktuellen Studien sind die Nebenwirkungen der Adjuvans-Plazebo-Gruppe sind genau so hoch wie der der Impf-Gruppe. Genausoviele Hirnhautentzündungen, genausoviele Rheumakranke, genaussoviele neurologische Störungen und mehr! Der Arzt bekommt vom Pharmavertreter erzählt, es wurden Plazebo-Studien gemacht. Man spricht hier nicht mehr von Adjuvans-Plazebo
- Und der Arzt und seine Patienten werden betrogen nach Strich und Faden.
So siehts aus!!!!
Korruptes Milieu!
Woher hast du diese Information?
Hier ein paar Daten (erster Wert Gardasil, zweiter Wert Placebo):
Juvenile arthritis - 1 (0.0%) - 0 (0.0%)
Neoplasm - 78 (0.7%) - 67 (0.7%)
GU neoplasm (reported as benign) - 1 (0.0%) - 0 (0.0%)
Hodgkin’s disease - 1 (0.0%) - 0 (0.0%)
Neuro - 269 (2.6%) - 217 (2.3%)
Headache - 114 (1.1%) - 86 (0.9%)
MS - 1 (0.0%) - 2 (0.0%)
Psych - 199 (1.9%) - 203 (2.2%)
Depression - 87 (0.8%) - 82 (0.9%)
Renal - 144 (1.4%) - 135 (1.4%)
Dysuria - 72 (0.7%) - 71 (0.8%)
Reproductive - 1574 (15.1%) - 1590 (16.9%)
Amenorrhea - 131 (1.3%) - 128 (1.4%)
Ectropion of cervix - 97 (0.9%) - 125 (1.3%)
Menstruation irregular - 165 (1.6%) - 199 (2.1%)
Vaginal discharge - 363 (3.5%) - 351 (3.7%)
Respiratory - 172 (1.6%) - 154 (1.6%)
Asthma - 29 (0.3%) - 29 (0.3%)
Cough - 42 (0.4%) - 41 (0.4%)
Skin - 312 (3.0%) - 303 (3.2%)
Surgery - 477 (4.6%) - 495 (5.3%)
Appendectomy - 17 (0.2%) - 26 (0.3%)
Vascular disorders - 45 (0.4%) - 38 (0.4%)
Hypertension - 21 (0.2%) - 8 (0.1%)
Es gibt also teilweise - je nach Krankheit - unterschiedliche Werte. Teilweise stimmen sie überein, andererseits ist der eine oder andere Wert höher, oft aber statistisch insignifikant.
Was ich nicht verstehe ist, warum sagst du
"der Arzt und seine Patienten werden betrogen"? Ich habe ja gesagt, ich würde die Nebenwirkungen abgleichen. Das hat Dr. Seurs aber netterweise schon für mich gemacht (
link):
The most obvious way to study this matter would be to inject various amounts of aluminum into kids and see what happens to it internally. We know from the FDA documents that aluminum toxicity does occur from other types of injectible treatments in those with impaired kidneys, that it can accumulate in the brain and bones in toxic amounts, that this may occur more commonly than is recognized, and that aluminum toxicity is hard to detect just by observing for symptoms. So what happens when the amount of aluminum in vaccines is injected? I'm not sure it would be ethical to inject human infants with aluminum for no good reason, but perhaps we could study it with vaccines that are already being given anyway?
I think vaccine manufacturers may have started wondering the same thing, because I found some interesting research in the product insert of the brand new HPV vaccine. The Merck Company actually added a little extra step to their safety research. They injected aluminum into a separate group of test subjects to use as a safety control group. They studied some of the side effects of their new vaccine compared to a saline placebo as well as the aluminum placebo. They found that the placebo with aluminum was a lot more painful than the saline placebo, and just about as painful as the full HPV shot. The aluminum placebo also caused a lot more redness, swelling, and itching than the saline placebo, but not quite as much as the full HPV shot. Unfortunately, they only looked at aluminum effects right at the injection site. They didn't state in the product insert what role the aluminum placebo played in all the other standard side effects like fever and flu-like symptoms, although they probably have this data somewhere. And they didn't study internal aluminum metabolism. But this research did show how reactive aluminum can be when injected into the muscles, and it was a good first step. I'm hoping that someone who is research minded and curious about this issue will explore it in complete detail so I can put it behind me, and you can feel more confident about vaccine safety
Was Merck also hier gemacht hat war eher förderlich, denn man kann jetzt mehrere verschiedene Placebogruppen beobachten und daraus deduzieren, welche Nebenwirkung zu welchem Verursacher gehört.
Abgesehen davon; wenn die Anzahl an Leuten, die diese und jene Krankheit bekommen haben ansatzweise gleich ist, dann ist das ja ein gutes Zeichen, denn es spricht dafür, dass der Impfstoff selbst keine Nebenwirkungen verursacht.
-> ES GIBT KEINE IMPFSTOFFE OHNE DIESE ZUSATZSTOFFE!!!