lazpel
Sehr aktives Mitglied
- Registriert
- 7. Juni 2004
- Beiträge
- 4.906
Hallo QIA S.O.L,
Er ist kein Physiker, sondern ein Neurophysiologe.
Und es gibt auch wertende Meinungen zu seinen Aussagen:
http://psychology.unn.ac.uk/dick/py126/Lectures/Lecture9.htm
Weitere Wiederlegungen zu der Quantum Mind-Idee werde ich noch nachreichen.
Gruß,
lazpel
QIA S.O.L schrieb:
Er ist kein Physiker, sondern ein Neurophysiologe.
Und es gibt auch wertende Meinungen zu seinen Aussagen:
http://psychology.unn.ac.uk/dick/py126/Lectures/Lecture9.htm
http://psychology.unn.ac.uk/dick/py126/Lectures/Lecture9.htm schrieb:2. In one of Grinberg-Zylberbaums early experiments[6] he put forward the syntergic theory of neuronal function. According to this, the brain is capable of creating a macroscopic alteration in the space-time lattice organization due to the energy interaction of all its neuronal elements.
The best that can be said of this theory is that it is ill-specified and vague.
In a later paper, G-Z puts forward a much better founded hypothesis, Quantum Mind theory. According to Q-M the brain operates using quantum processes (processes concerned with very small physical particles. See HANDOUT A theory of consciousness.)
There are severe problems with the Q-M theory however. Such processes take place usually at sub-zero temperatures in well-controlled environments. Is it possible for meaningful quantum processes to take place in a warm wet environment such as the brain? Roger Penrose (The Large, The Small and the Human Mind) and Stuart Hameroff (an anaesthesiologist: see his website http://www.consciousness.arizona.edu/hameroff/) maintain that it is.
Weitere Wiederlegungen zu der Quantum Mind-Idee werde ich noch nachreichen.
Gruß,
lazpel