ich habe einen genau contraren text gefunden, der sich just auf den von mir
benutzten ausdruck adept bezieht:
>> I read a book once that suggested if you have a missing element you are
actually an 'adept' of that element. As in having mastered that element in
previous lives, so you don't really 'need' it anymore. Forgot the author/title
(...)
Sometimes this theory seems to really work, and other times not at all,
There's a brilliant book by Bazhaff & Tehler "Secrets of Love & Partnership"
that goes into detail about the missing or least off element in the chart,
and how we often meet this element in our relationships. (...)<<
>>The book you refer to that relates the absence of an element to a certain
'adepthood" may have been Astrologik by Antero Alli. If so, I have it from
inside sources that what Antero meant by 'adept' was not so much a past
life reference (though this may also apply) but more how 'nature abhors
a vacuum'.
When an element is missing from a chart or present in very low degree,
Alli suggests that the need for that element becomes more pronounced;
we need what we genuinely lack. When a real need is exposed, it usually
gets met one way or another, need being different from desire or wish or
expectations.
For example, my wife has no earth in her chart save for Chiron yet she owns
ten times more material thngs than me and expresses a far greater physical
(earth) adepthood as a yogini in excellent physcial shape and health (she
looks 20 years younger than her actual age). (...)<<
source: ein forum im www namens
http://astronuts.tribe.net
